Wednesday, 25 June 2014

Raw (Cassandra Barnette) TERM 2: ANNOTATIONS X 5

1).

Dyer, R. (2003, February 13). Sean Dawson. Contemporary Visual Arts, 58, 46-49.

The article-based essay is about the artist Sean Dawson, featured in the magazine “Contemporary Visual Arts”, written by the art critic Richard Dyer.

Dyer investigates one of Dawson’s earlier paintings 'Destroyed Rooms series'. Describing Dawsons painting as “maelstrom of a dedifferentiated meta-spatial matrix where the conventional laws of physics have been warped, inverted or completely suspended” (Richard Dyer, 2003, pp. 47-49). Creating an abstracted illusionistic effect like kaleidoscope, working from found images based on the edges of society. 

Dawson’s works are strongly connected to a movement that developed directly from Abstract Expressionism, known as ‘Abstract Illusionism’ in the late 1960’s.  

Key ideas evolve around exploration of painting and breaking away from the conventional principles of Renaissance painting. And key issues of separation “those areas of culture that demarcate the edges of acceptance” (Richard Dyer, 2003, pp. 48-49) for example, the tattooed body etc.


Dawson’s illusionistic style painting is very intriguing, manipulating his use of found images with paint in relation to the ideas of separation of cultures within a society.I think the process is very delicate,his paintings gives insight to preconceived ideas of acceptance of cultures. Which the images are abstracted and warped, giving the work a new meaning.   

2).

Galbraith, H. Psychic In H. Galbraith (Ed). , Francis Upritchard: Save Yourself (pp. 31-33). New Plymouth: Govett-Brewester Art Gallery & Francis Upritchard: Save Yourself Project Team. (Exhibition catalogue.) (Plus images of Upritchard’s work from pp. 94-96 & p. 6.)

The text is a form of Art writing, Art critic Galbraith gives details and ideas surrounding Francis Upritchard Art work. A New Zealand female artist based in London, she draws from the rich sources of history investigating ritual traditions. Upritchard also explores trafficking of Mokomokai (preserved heads) of the 19th century between New Zealand and Europe. 

Upritchard incorporates found materials old fur coats, vessels gloves etc, into her sculptures. The representation of Upritchards heads (mokomokai) are not that of Maori, which was a customary practice, “but rather they depicted hapless Pakeha (European descendents)” (Gallbraith, H pp. 31) heads.

In my opinion Upritchard makes a statement, how would it feel if it were your people shipped away to foreign lands, kept in private collections or displayed in museums for your own curiosity and entertainment? By exchanging the heads ethnicity to “European” she creates a dialogue and a mirror letting her work visually bring to light what the “Maori” people feel, in other words trading places.  

I found Upritchards approach very interesting by changing the Mokomokai (originally Maori) into Pakeha (European) effective. Makes me think and question myself, what if I was to trade places with someone, from a different culture? I feel it does relate to the society I live in, quick to fulfill our own desires entertainment and curiosity, yet slow to understand the ripple effect it might have on others.


3).

Seung Yul Oh
Wood, A.P. (2009). Seung Yul Oh. In F. Campbell (Ed.), The Big Book of Essays: New Zealand Contemporary Art from the Real Art Roadshow: Black Collection (p. 44). Wanaka: Real Art Charitable Trust.

An Art writing by the art critic Andrew Paul Wood explores Korean born artist Seung Yul Oh paintings. Although he was born in Korea he studied and trained in New Zealand as an artist.
Wood describes Oh’s painting as “ heavily textured, quasi-abstract expressionists drips and blobs”  (Andrew P, Wood, p. 44) that are cartoony, bright coloured and his works exercise the free act of doodling.

In my opinion I see connections to abstract expressionism and surrealism in Oh’s paintings. “Tapping into the subconscious mind to see what forms might appear” (Andrew P, Wood, p.44) which was evident in these two art movements, they explored the unconscious also, delivering expressive gestural marks, portraying emotions through colour and abstracted figures in a time of war and depression conveyed through their paintings.

Wood also states that “younger East Asian artists asserting their identities in Europe and the United States” (Andrew P, Wood, pp. 44). I believe Oh engages and combines themes of East Asian pop culture and Western culture. In order to implement synthesis, for example; bright compelling colours and adorable aesthetic, referencing Korean pop culture. On the other hand adopts abstract expressionism mark makings in the process of exploring Western culture. As one acceptable culture instead of two separate nations/cultures.

That constructs a dialect between two cultures and the understanding of individual (identity) expression, through the vision of art.   

I find painting in this manner extremely unrestricted and free to express, like the art movement I am interested in abstract expressionism. I enjoy the ideas of connecting two cultures through painting especially in Seung Yul Oh’s work; it takes away the seriousness and deploys a side rarely seen (humour) which I believe is a breath of fresh air.

        
4).

Thomas, M., Wystan, C., & Barabara, K., G.,(2004).Max Gimblett: The Brush of all Things. In Thomas, M.,(Eds.),The Transition from Three to Four, (pp.10-11) New Zealand,(NZ),Auckland Art Gallery.

An essay formatted text by art critic Thomas Mcevilley featured in ‘Max Gimblett THE BRUSH OF ALL THINGS’.

The essay is constructed around the New Zealand born artist Max Gimblett.But now lives in the United States of America.

Mcevilley enlightens us with Gimbletts associations and many influences from Abstract Expressionism and Zen. And the context of Eastern and Western cultures represented within his paintings as an establishment of his position.

According to Mcevilley “New Zealand, in terms of the map of the world, is roughly halfway between Japan and the United states.”(Mcevilley, T. 2004, pp.10-11) indicating, I believe why Gimblett reaches out to these two distant cultures, which are prominent characters in his paintings. He finds himself in the middle.

By merging these cultures together for example, his Ghosts, Demons and Dragons painting. Gimblett Incorporates the gestural technique of Abstract Expressionism (America) and the light hearted method of ink drawing of Zen (Japan).

Mcevilley I believe points out the possibilities luxuries of being connected to numerous associations like in Gimbletts case, Gimblett has intricately unified cultures in his paintings. And has become a medium in some sense between cultures. I question myself? What would be the best way too unite people and what comes up is art.               

5).
Wallis, S. (2003, February 13). Beatriz Milhazles. Contemporary Visual Arts, 58, 88-89.

An article in the Contemporary Visual Arts magazine about
Beatriz Milhazes a Brazilian female artist. Critiqued by art critic Simon Wallis.

The article talks about Milhazes paintings that is intensely decorative of figurative abstractions. Striking imagery of tropical flora and folk art associated with Brazil.

Evoking intimate thoughts, exploring contingent states of mind and the influencing of mood and character. Through her large scaled exotic coloured paintings.  

According to Wallis Beatriz “paintings has an almost hypnotic effect” (Wallis, S. 2003, p.88) for example her painting ‘O Quadrado’, 1997. Circles overlap one another, a green backdrop, golden brown and red; white forming the bases black and purple, blue dots locked in like a ferris wheel.   

Milhazes painting in my opinion engages with ideas of creating a reaction within her viewers “allowing a new set of relationships to occur” (Wallis, S. 2003, p.89) which sets a purposeful engagement, either it be emotional or the freedom of self-questioning.

No comments:

Post a Comment